Criminal Cases against
Central Ministers of U.P.A.
Cases against Shri Laloo Prasad Yadav
Fooder Scam :
| 1 | RC.20(A) Fraudulent withdrawal |
Treasury Chaibasa Rs. 37,30,39,743/- Trial is on. More than 180 P.W.S. examined. |
| 2 | R.C. 38 (A)/96 | Dumka Treasury Rs. 3,76, 38,853/- (Charge Sheet Filed) Trial Pending |
| 3 | R.C. 47(A)/96 Fraudulent withdrawal |
Treasury Doranda, Ranchi Rs. 182 crores (Charge sheet already submitted) Trial Pending |
| 4 | R.C. 63(A)/96 | Bhagalpur Treasury Rs. 45 lacs (Charge sheet submitted Trial Pending |
| 5 | R.C. 64(A)/96 | Treasury Dumka Rs. 95 lacs. (Charge sheet submitted) Trial Pending |
| 6 | R.C. 5(A)/96 | Treasury Chaibasa Rs. 37.63 Crores (Charge sheet submitted) Trial Pending |
| Disproportionate Asset case | ||
| 7 | R.C. 5(A)/98 Disproportionate amount |
Spl. Case No. 5/98-D.A. Case Rs. 42 lacs Evidence closed (132 PW and 94 DW examined) Argument going on since May first week. |
Some of the Cases against Md. Taslimuddin, MoS
*
Araria PS 40/86 -- 341/342/323/307/504/506/379/34 IPC assault, attempt to commit murder and snatching valuables by wrongful confinement.
*
Araria PS 42/86 -- 147/148/149/307/341/353/332/504 IPC Attempt to commit murder and assault to public servant to deter him performance of his duty by framing unlawful assembly.
*
Araria PS 45/86 -- 409/420/467/468/471/120 (B) IPC to commit cheating and possessing forge documents.
*
Araria PS 375/95 -- 147/148/149/307/ IPC 27 arms act & 3/4 Explosive substance Act-attempt to commit murder by framing unlawful assembly using fire arms and explosives.
*
Kishanganj 700/ C/98 U/S 147/447/323/328/327/384/109/347/379/120 (B)/34 IPC making unlawful assembly to commit theft, assault. Mischief & extortion.
Cases against Jai Prakash Yadav, MoS
*
Case pending IPC section 420, 465, 267, 468, 471, 120 B, 13(2), 13(1), Prevention of corruption Act and other Laws.
*
Also arrested in the above case concerning fraudulent approval to a private educational institute.
Allegation against M.A.Fatimi, MoS
*
The then S.P., Darbhanga Smt. Shobha Ahotkar has reported that Shri Fatimi was giving patronage to a notorious criminal gang of Fazlur Rahman who was a close associate of Dawood Ibraham. This was widely reported in newspapers including reports of telephonic conversation.
Criminal cases of heinous offences punishable with imprisonment up to 7 years or more, pending in Araria and Purnia Criminal Courts were deliberately and intentionally concealed by Taslimuddin. The pending criminal cases against him range from attempt to murder to wrongful restraint to wrongful confinement, causing hurt and criminal intimidation. Details of the pending cases are given below :-
1.
Araria S.S.T. No 232/1996 titled as "State Vs.Taslimuddin and others. Cognizance under Section 147/148/149/341/342/307/323/504 & 506 IPC (rioting, armed deadly weapon, kidnapping, attempt to murder and criminal intimidation) was taken on 04.04.1987.
2.
Araria G.R. 172/1986 under Section 147/148/323/341/342/504/307/506 IPC (rioting, armed with deadly weapon, kidnapping, attempt to murder and criminal intimidation).
3.
Araria G.R. 1639/96 under as "State Vs. Taslimuddin. Cognizance under Section 147/148/149/307 IPC (rioting, armed with deadly weapon and attempt to murder) was taken on 23.08.1999.
4.
Araria G.R. 176/1986 under section 307 IPC (attempt to murder) titled as "M. Mandal Vs. Md. Taslimuddin, now transferred to Purnia Court.
5.
Araria G.R. 335 under Section 420/467/468/120-B IPC (cheating, forgery of valuable securities and criminal conspiracy).
6.
Araria G.R. Case No. 655/1982 titled as "Stae Vs. Md. Taslimuddin. Cognizance under Section 309/38 IPC (attempts to commit suicide) was taken on 15.09.1982.
7.
Araria P.S. 133/82.
The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Judgement dated 2nd May, 2002 in Union of India Vs. Association for Democratic Reforms and another directed that "appropriate steps be taken for disclosure of criminal cases pending and in which the candidate has been charged to be disclosed as the people had the right of information". Pursuant to judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court, Election Commission of India vide its Order dated 28th June, 2002 and vide Order No. 3/ER/2003/JS-II dated 27th March, 2003 made it mandatory to disclose the criminal antecedents of a candidate.
In blatant violation of the fundamental rights of people and in violation and abuse of the process of law, Taslimuddin while filing his Nomination fabricated, forged, concealed and made wrong and incorrect statements for which action should be taken under The Representation of People's Act. If criminals with known criminal antecedent, like Taslimuddin are allowed to represent the nation, it is indeed a black mark on the world's most vibrant Democracy.
To Write Comment Please लॉगिन
.gif)
